Gaming overtaking lifestyle in creator budgets sounds like a clean headline. It is also a claim you should test before acting on it. As creator spend diversifies, gaming audiences are bigger, more live, and more commercial than many media plans assume. But shifting budget on a trend line, without a measurement plan, is how brands pay premium rates for reach they can’t prove.
What the numbers support, and what they don’t
No single public dataset I could open confirms a precise crossover where gaming spend passes lifestyle spend. Treat that framing as a directional signal, not a settled fact. The supporting evidence, though, is real.
Start with the pie itself. Marketing Dive’s coverage of the IAB report says U.S. creator ad spend was projected to reach $37 billion in 2025, a 26% increase from $29.5 billion in 2024. A growing pie means vertical shares move even when no one is cutting anything. Lifestyle can hold flat in dollars and still lose share.
Then look at where attention sits. Streams Charts reported that livestreaming outside mainland China surpassed 30 billion hours watched in Q4 2025. On TikTok, Streams Charts found viewing passed 10 billion hours in a single quarter, yet gaming made up under 15% of it.
Read those two together. Live attention is growing on platforms where gaming is a minority, while Twitch keeps declining in watch time. That is diversification, not a gaming land grab.
Gaming is not simply taking lifestyle’s budget. Creator spend is spreading across verticals and formats, and the brands that win will be the ones that can prove which slice works.
Why budgets are leaving the lifestyle default
Lifestyle was the safe vertical for years. Broad audience, easy brand fit, low reputational risk. Safe is also crowded, and crowded means rising rates and blurred results.
Gaming offers three things lifestyle often can’t. Long-form and live formats give you minutes of attention rather than seconds. Communities are tight, so a recommendation carries weight. And the audience is already comfortable spending inside digital ecosystems.
That last point matters beyond games. People in these communities pay for things online, routinely, and the broader gaming economy shows it through steady growth in in-game and direct-to-consumer spending. People in these communities pay for things online, routinely.
Is that useful for a non-gaming advertiser? Sometimes. A fintech app, a peripheral maker, an energy drink brand, or a streaming service has an obvious fit. A skincare line needs a harder argument.
The measurement trap
Here is where I’d slow a team down. Gaming creator campaigns often get judged on views and live concurrency, because those numbers are easy to pull. They are poor proxies for sales.
The IAB survey in the Marketing Dive piece shows how the buy side sees it. Among more than 450 ad-spend decision makers, 40% ranked overall return on investment as their top performance indicator for creator campaigns. Yet advertisers also flagged attribution, consistent reporting, and creator vetting as areas needing improvement. Brands want ROI and still lack the plumbing to show it.
So before you move a dollar, answer these questions:
- What is the conversion event? Installs, trials, code redemptions, or store visits. Pick one before the brief goes out.
- Is the audience yours? Ask for demographic and geographic breakdowns, not just totals.
- Can you isolate lift? Use holdout regions or time windows. Our piece on holdout tests covers the method.
- What happens to the content after the stream ends? Clips and VODs carry the long tail, and rights terms decide whether you can reuse them.
Skip these and a gaming pilot becomes an expensive awareness campaign you can’t defend in the next budget review.
Live is where the operational burden lands
Gaming budgets skew toward live, and live is harder to run than a scripted post. You can’t edit a stream. You can’t approve every sentence in advance. And a creator in a four-hour session will say something unscripted.
That changes your process. Contracts need clear conduct clauses, disclosure requirements that work on-screen and in chat, and a plan for what you do if a creator’s behavior shifts mid-campaign. Staffing matters too. Someone has to watch. Our coverage of TikTok Live staffing lays out what that looks like in practice, and the analysis of gaming creator tactics shows why those playbooks are spreading into other verticals.
There is also a platform angle. Twitch watch time is falling for a fourth straight quarter per Streams Charts, while TikTok grows. A plan built only around Twitch is a plan built on a shrinking base. Spread test budgets across at least two platforms, and compare cost per outcome, not cost per hour watched.
Where lifestyle still wins
Don’t gut it. Lifestyle creators still convert for categories built on trust, routine, and visual proof: food, home, beauty, travel. The shift is toward niche allocation, not away from lifestyle. We’ve tracked this in niche creator budgets, where sports and travel sit alongside lifestyle rather than replacing it.
A reasonable approach for a mid-size program:
- Keep your proven lifestyle core at current levels for one quarter.
- Carve out a modest test slice of the creator budget for gaming or live formats, sized to what you can afford to lose while you learn.
- Run both against the same conversion definition.
- Reallocate only after you see cost per outcome, not impressions.
That percentage is a starting point from practice, not a benchmark from a study. Adjust it for your category and risk tolerance.
Vetting gets harder as the field widens
More verticals mean more creators you have never worked with. Gaming creators bring a particular risk: audiences are vocal and quick to spot a forced sponsorship.
Check chat quality, not only follower counts. Look at how a creator handled previous sponsors. Ask for sample analytics. And be careful with headline engagement rates, which can mislead on small channels, as we explain in nano creator engagement.
Diversifying creator spend only pays off if each new vertical gets the same measurement standard as the old one. Otherwise you are adding risk, not reach.
Finally, remember that spend shifts rarely help creators evenly. A few earn most of the money, so rate negotiations with top gaming names can be steep. Know your walk-away price.
FAQs
Has gaming actually overtaken lifestyle in creator spend?
There is no public, verified dataset I could open that shows a clean crossover. Evidence points to diversification: total U.S. creator ad spend is growing quickly, and live viewing is expanding across gaming and non-gaming content. Treat “gaming overtakes lifestyle” as a directional trend and check it against your own results.
How much is creator advertising worth?
According to Marketing Dive’s report on the IAB findings, U.S. creator ad spend was projected at $37 billion for 2025, up 26% from $29.5 billion in 2024.
Is gaming only relevant for gaming brands?
No. Apps, fintech, consumer electronics, beverages, and streaming services often fit well. Categories that depend on visual demonstration, such as beauty or home, usually need a stronger rationale and a small test first.
Which platforms should I test for gaming creators?
Use at least two. Per Streams Charts, Twitch watch time has declined for a fourth straight quarter, while TikTok grew 8.5% quarter over quarter in Q4 2025. Compare cost per outcome across platforms rather than hours watched.
How should I measure a gaming creator campaign?
Define one conversion event before launch, use unique codes or links per creator, and run holdout comparisons where possible. Report views as context, not as proof of return.
What contract terms matter most for live gaming sponsorships?
Disclosure requirements for stream and chat, conduct clauses, clip and VOD reuse rights, and clear payment triggers. Our guide on content licensing explains how to price reuse.
Next step: pick one gaming or live pilot this quarter, define a single conversion metric, and hold your lifestyle core steady so you can compare cost per outcome side by side before moving any more budget.
Top Influencer Marketing Agencies
The leading agencies shaping influencer marketing in 2026
Agencies ranked by campaign performance, client diversity, platform expertise, proven ROI, industry recognition, and client satisfaction. Assessed through verified case studies, reviews, and industry consultations.
Moburst
-
2
The Shelf
Boutique Beauty & Lifestyle Influencer AgencyA data-driven boutique agency specializing exclusively in beauty, wellness, and lifestyle influencer campaigns on Instagram and TikTok. Best for brands already focused on the beauty/personal care space that need curated, aesthetic-driven content.Clients: Pepsi, The Honest Company, Hims, Elf Cosmetics, Pure LeafVisit The Shelf → -
3
Audiencly
Niche Gaming & Esports Influencer AgencyA specialized agency focused exclusively on gaming and esports creators on YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok. Ideal if your campaign is 100% gaming-focused — from game launches to hardware and esports events.Clients: Epic Games, NordVPN, Ubisoft, Wargaming, Tencent GamesVisit Audiencly → -
4
Viral Nation
Global Influencer Marketing & Talent AgencyA dual talent management and marketing agency with proprietary brand safety tools and a global creator network spanning nano-influencers to celebrities across all major platforms.Clients: Meta, Activision Blizzard, Energizer, Aston Martin, WalmartVisit Viral Nation → -
5
The Influencer Marketing Factory
TikTok, Instagram & YouTube CampaignsA full-service agency with strong TikTok expertise, offering end-to-end campaign management from influencer discovery through performance reporting with a focus on platform-native content.Clients: Google, Snapchat, Universal Music, Bumble, YelpVisit TIMF → -
6
NeoReach
Enterprise Analytics & Influencer CampaignsAn enterprise-focused agency combining managed campaigns with a powerful self-service data platform for influencer search, audience analytics, and attribution modeling.Clients: Amazon, Airbnb, Netflix, Honda, The New York TimesVisit NeoReach → -
7
Ubiquitous
Creator-First Marketing PlatformA tech-driven platform combining self-service tools with managed campaign options, emphasizing speed and scalability for brands managing multiple influencer relationships.Clients: Lyft, Disney, Target, American Eagle, NetflixVisit Ubiquitous → -
8
Obviously
Scalable Enterprise Influencer CampaignsA tech-enabled agency built for high-volume campaigns, coordinating hundreds of creators simultaneously with end-to-end logistics, content rights management, and product seeding.Clients: Google, Ulta Beauty, Converse, AmazonVisit Obviously →