Nearly one in three online purchases could be initiated by an AI agent within the next few years, according to industry forecasts, and most brands still have no idea how these bots decide what to buy. Mastercard’s recent research into agentic commerce confirms what savvy marketers suspected: when bots do the shopping, visibility depends on structured data and verified trust signals, not clever ad copy. That shift changes the entire playbook for brand strategists managing digital shelf presence.
The Bots Are Already Buying
Forget the theoretical “someday” framing. Shopping agents are transacting right now. Mastercard’s Agent Pay initiative, Visa’s Intelligent Commerce program, and OpenAI’s Operator have all moved past pilot phase into live commercial deployments. These systems browse product listings, compare prices, check return policies, and complete checkout, often without a human ever seeing the product page.
That’s a problem for brands that built their entire digital presence around persuading a person. An agent doesn’t care about your hero image or your influencer unboxing video. It cares about whether your product data is machine-readable, accurate, and consistent across every source it can access.
Mastercard’s research frames this bluntly: agents don’t browse, they query. If your brand can’t answer a structured query with confidence, you don’t exist in the transaction.
What Mastercard’s Research Actually Found
The findings center on a few uncomfortable truths for marketers. First, agents weight verified merchant data (SKU accuracy, inventory status, price consistency) far more heavily than brand sentiment or social proof in the traditional sense. Second, trust signals like payment security certifications and dispute resolution history now function as ranking factors inside the agent’s decision logic, not just backend risk metrics.
Third, and this is the part that should worry CMOs: agents default to brands with the cleanest, most consistent data footprint across multiple retailers and platforms, even if a competitor has stronger organic search rankings or a bigger paid media budget. Inconsistent pricing between your own site and a marketplace listing can knock you out of consideration entirely, because the agent reads that as risk, not a promotional quirk.
This mirrors a pattern we’ve already seen play out in AI search more broadly. Zero click search behavior already strips away the traffic brands used to rely on for attribution, and agentic shopping takes that a step further by removing the human decision moment altogether.
Why Traditional SEO Doesn’t Work on Agents
Search engine optimization was built for a human reading a page and forming an impression. Agent optimization is closer to database querying. The agent isn’t impressed by your meta description. It’s checking whether your structured data, schema markup, and product feeds match across every touchpoint it can see.
This is why entity consistency has become the unglamorous, unavoidable foundation of visibility. Brands with fragmented product catalogs, mismatched attributes, or outdated inventory feeds are functionally invisible to a shopping agent, regardless of how strong their brand equity is with humans. Our earlier coverage of clean entity data and how it feeds AI citation engines applies directly here: agents pull from the same commercial graphs that power AI search answers.
Third-party validation matters too. Business data providers like D&B increasingly feed the commercial graphs that agents query for legitimacy checks, and bad data quietly costs citations in exactly the way it now costs agent visibility.
How Brands Win Visibility With Shopping Agents
So what actually moves the needle? A few concrete levers stand out from Mastercard’s research and parallel work happening across the agentic commerce space.
- Standardize product data everywhere it appears. Price, availability, and specifications need to match across your site, marketplaces, and any syndicated feeds. Agents cross-reference, and discrepancies read as unreliability.
- Invest in structured data markup. Schema.org product, offer, and review markup gives agents a machine-readable path to your listings. Google’s own structured data guidance is a reasonable baseline even for non-search agent contexts.
- Secure verified payment and trust credentials. Certifications tied to secure checkout and dispute resolution are increasingly parsed as ranking inputs, not just compliance checkboxes.
- Keep inventory feeds real-time. An agent that hits a stockout after committing to your product burns trust fast, and some agentic systems appear to deprioritize brands with a history of that failure.
- Monitor how third-party data aggregators represent you. You don’t control every source an agent queries, but you can audit and correct the major ones.
None of this replaces brand building. But it reframes brand building as a data infrastructure problem as much as a creative one, and that’s a hard pill for marketing teams still organized around campaigns rather than systems.
Creator Content Still Matters, Just Differently
Here’s where it gets interesting for anyone running influencer programs. Agents don’t watch videos, but they increasingly ingest structured summaries of reviews, ratings, and creator-driven content that’s been indexed into commercial graphs. A creator’s honest product review, if it’s captured in a format an agent can parse, can function as a trust signal much like a certification badge.
This is pushing some brands to rethink creator briefs entirely, prioritizing content that generates quotable, structured claims (specific use cases, comparison points, verified pros and cons) over pure aesthetic appeal. Teams already running multi-agent creator campaign systems are ahead here, since they’re already building workflows that treat creator output as structured data rather than one-off content assets.
Paid media is shifting in parallel. Agentic ad platforms bidding autonomously means budget allocation itself is becoming machine-negotiated, which compounds the pressure on brands to have clean, agent-legible data feeding both the demand side and the supply side of these transactions.
The Compliance and Attribution Gap
Regulators haven’t caught up. When an AI agent selects a product on a shopper’s behalf, who’s accountable if the data was misleading, or if a sponsored placement wasn’t disclosed appropriately? The FTC has existing endorsement guidance, but it was written for human-facing disclosures, not agent-to-agent negotiations happening in milliseconds.
Attribution is murkier still. Marketing teams already struggle to prove ROI when platform data is unreliable, a problem we’ve covered extensively around marketing mix modeling’s resurgence as trust in platform-reported numbers collapses. Agentic transactions add another layer of opacity: if a bot completes a purchase without a trackable session, standard analytics tools may never register the conversion path at all.
Brands running agent-facing commerce without an audit trail are flying blind on both compliance and ROI, and that combination should worry any CMO signing off on the budget.
This is exactly the kind of blind spot addressed in work on auditing AI marketing actions, which argues that trust layers need to be built before agentic volume scales further, not after something goes wrong publicly.
Building an Agent-Ready Brand Playbook
Practically speaking, most brand teams need to start with an audit, not a campaign. Pull your product data from every channel an agent might query: your own site, major marketplaces, retailer syndication feeds, and any commercial data graph you can access. Look for inconsistencies in price, availability, and specifications. Fix them before you touch anything else.
Next, treat structured data and schema markup as a standing line item, not a one-time technical project. Product catalogs change, and stale markup is arguably worse than no markup because it actively feeds agents bad information.
Finally, build a cross-functional team that includes commerce, compliance, and marketing. Agentic visibility sits at the intersection of all three, and siloed ownership is how brands end up invisible to a system they didn’t know was making decisions on their behalf. Research from eMarketer and Statista both point to accelerating consumer comfort with AI-assisted purchasing, which means the window to get this right is shrinking, not expanding.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mastercard’s AI agent research about?
Mastercard studied how AI shopping agents (bots that browse, compare, and purchase products on a consumer’s behalf) make decisions, finding that verified merchant data and trust signals outweigh traditional brand marketing factors in agent-driven transactions.
How do AI shopping agents choose which brands to buy from?
Agents prioritize structured, consistent product data across multiple sources, verified payment and security credentials, and real-time inventory accuracy. Inconsistent pricing or outdated stock information can remove a brand from consideration entirely.
Does SEO still matter if AI agents are doing the shopping?
Traditional SEO tactics built around human browsing behavior lose relevance, but structured data, schema markup, and entity consistency (the technical backbone of SEO) become more important, not less, because agents rely on machine-readable signals to make decisions.
Can influencer content still influence agentic purchases?
Yes, but the format matters. Creator content that generates structured, quotable claims (specific comparisons, verified use cases, ratings) is more likely to be ingested by agents than purely visual or entertainment-driven content.
What compliance risks come with agentic commerce?
Disclosure and endorsement rules written for human-facing marketing haven’t been updated for agent-to-agent transactions, creating ambiguity around accountability when an agent selects a product based on incomplete or misleading data.
Start with a full data audit across every channel an agent might query, because clean, consistent product data is now the single biggest lever brands control in agentic commerce, and the brands that fix it first will be the ones bots actually find.
Top Influencer Marketing Agencies
The leading agencies shaping influencer marketing in 2026
Agencies ranked by campaign performance, client diversity, platform expertise, proven ROI, industry recognition, and client satisfaction. Assessed through verified case studies, reviews, and industry consultations.
Moburst
-
2
The Shelf
Boutique Beauty & Lifestyle Influencer AgencyA data-driven boutique agency specializing exclusively in beauty, wellness, and lifestyle influencer campaigns on Instagram and TikTok. Best for brands already focused on the beauty/personal care space that need curated, aesthetic-driven content.Clients: Pepsi, The Honest Company, Hims, Elf Cosmetics, Pure LeafVisit The Shelf → -
3
Audiencly
Niche Gaming & Esports Influencer AgencyA specialized agency focused exclusively on gaming and esports creators on YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok. Ideal if your campaign is 100% gaming-focused — from game launches to hardware and esports events.Clients: Epic Games, NordVPN, Ubisoft, Wargaming, Tencent GamesVisit Audiencly → -
4
Viral Nation
Global Influencer Marketing & Talent AgencyA dual talent management and marketing agency with proprietary brand safety tools and a global creator network spanning nano-influencers to celebrities across all major platforms.Clients: Meta, Activision Blizzard, Energizer, Aston Martin, WalmartVisit Viral Nation → -
5
The Influencer Marketing Factory
TikTok, Instagram & YouTube CampaignsA full-service agency with strong TikTok expertise, offering end-to-end campaign management from influencer discovery through performance reporting with a focus on platform-native content.Clients: Google, Snapchat, Universal Music, Bumble, YelpVisit TIMF → -
6
NeoReach
Enterprise Analytics & Influencer CampaignsAn enterprise-focused agency combining managed campaigns with a powerful self-service data platform for influencer search, audience analytics, and attribution modeling.Clients: Amazon, Airbnb, Netflix, Honda, The New York TimesVisit NeoReach → -
7
Ubiquitous
Creator-First Marketing PlatformA tech-driven platform combining self-service tools with managed campaign options, emphasizing speed and scalability for brands managing multiple influencer relationships.Clients: Lyft, Disney, Target, American Eagle, NetflixVisit Ubiquitous → -
8
Obviously
Scalable Enterprise Influencer CampaignsA tech-enabled agency built for high-volume campaigns, coordinating hundreds of creators simultaneously with end-to-end logistics, content rights management, and product seeding.Clients: Google, Ulta Beauty, Converse, AmazonVisit Obviously →