87% of marketers say AI has made their teams more productive. Fewer than half can prove it moved revenue. That gap, surfaced in new Emplifi research, is the uncomfortable truth sitting in every CMO’s dashboard right now. Teams are faster. Budgets are not following, because nobody can show the board where the money actually went.
If you run an influencer program, a brand team, or an agency book of business, you’ve probably lived this exact conversation. Leadership asks what AI is doing for the business. You point to content velocity, faster captions, quicker reports. Then someone asks for the revenue number, and the room goes quiet.
The productivity story is real. The ROI story is not keeping pace.
Emplifi’s “State of Social Media Marketing 2027” report is based on a survey of 405 marketing managers, directors, and executives across the US, UK, Australia, and New Zealand. The topline numbers look like a win for AI advocates: 87 percent of marketers say AI has improved their team’s productivity, yet fewer than half (48 percent) say their team can confidently demonstrate social media ROI to leadership through clear attribution and data.
Dig one layer deeper and the “productivity” claim softens too. Only 38 percent of marketers report their productivity increase from AI as significant, suggesting that, for most teams, the gains are meaningful rather than transformational. This is not a story of AI failing. It’s a story of AI delivering exactly what it was built to deliver (speed and volume) while the measurement infrastructure around it hasn’t caught up.
Marketers are producing more content, faster, with AI. But reach and impressions still dominate the KPI conversation, while revenue attribution lags far behind, which means productivity gains are visible and ROI gains are not.
Where AI is actually doing the work
The adoption data tells you exactly where AI has embedded itself in daily workflows, and it’s almost entirely on the content and reporting side, not the revenue side. Adoption is strongest in caption and copywriting (72 percent), ideation (70 percent), image generation (64 percent) and reporting and analytics (64 percent), while 60 percent are not yet using AI for community management. That pattern should worry anyone trying to connect AI spend to pipeline. The tools are concentrated in production and reporting tasks, which are the easiest to automate and the hardest to trace to a dollar figure.
Time savings are genuinely significant, which makes the ROI gap more frustrating, not less. Approximately 62 percent of marketers spend four or more hours a week on reporting and analytics, but 69 percent say AI has saved their team at least three hours a week on these tasks over the past 12 months. That’s real capacity freed up. The question Emplifi’s own CMO raises is pointed: what happens to that reclaimed time? “AI is giving social teams hours back, with more than two in three saving three or more [hours] a week on reporting. The question now is how that time is used. Teams that pour it into more content will only add to the pressure. Teams that invest it in listening, responding and better judgment will deliver stronger customer experiences and work their people can sustain,” Wilson added.
That’s the hard part for brand leaders to accept. Saved hours don’t automatically become attributed revenue. They become whatever the team chooses to do next, and most teams default to producing more content rather than building better measurement.
Why the KPI mix is the real culprit
Here’s where the ROI gap stops being mysterious and starts being a choice. Marketers are still measuring the things AI makes easy to measure, not the things leadership actually wants to see. When it comes to proving impact, reach and impressions (58 percent) and engagement rate are the KPIs marketers most often rank among their top three, while fewer than one in three include social-attributed revenue among their top three KPIs. And when teams do try to connect the dots to revenue, they hit a wall: attribution remains the most commonly cited reporting challenge.
This isn’t an Emplifi-specific problem. It’s an industry-wide measurement crisis that’s been building for years. Gartner’s broader CMO research backs this up with a sobering figure: in its senior marketing leader survey, only 52% of CMOs and other senior marketing leaders said they were successful in proving the value of marketing and receiving credit for helping meet enterprise objectives. AI didn’t create the attribution problem. It just made the volume of unattributed activity bigger and faster.
There’s a governance angle compounding this too. If your org is still running influencer deals on reach and impressions, the shift toward pairing attention with purchase data is no longer optional. Brands that have made that switch report far cleaner conversations with finance, because the KPI itself is designed to map to revenue instead of vanity metrics.
Governance gaps are widening the exposure
Productivity gains without governance create a different kind of risk: shadow AI usage that nobody signed off on. More than half of respondents say they use AI tools that their company has not approved at least some of the time, up from 42 percent last year. Formal policy hasn’t kept pace with adoption. Only 37 percent of organizations have a fully defined AI policy for marketing, while a further 41 percent have partial guidelines. That leaves roughly a quarter of marketing organizations operating with no real guardrails at all.
Ask marketers what’s slowing broader AI adoption and the answer isn’t skills or budget, it’s trust in the output. Brand safety and content quality are the biggest barriers to broader AI adoption (26 percent), followed by a lack of skills or training (19 percent) and integration with existing tools (16 percent). That’s a direct echo of what Influencers Time has covered on the influencer side, where moderation and brand safety vendors have become a core line item rather than a nice-to-have, precisely because unsupervised content at scale creates liability faster than it creates revenue.
This governance gap isn’t unique to social and influencer teams. It mirrors what’s happening at the enterprise budget level. Gartner’s 2026 CMO Spend Survey found that CMOs are allocating an average of 15.3% of marketing budgets to AI initiatives, yet most marketing organizations lack the maturity to scale those investments, according to a survey by Gartner, Inc. While 70% of CMOs say becoming an AI leader is a critical goal, only 30% report mature or fully developed AI readiness capabilities. Spend is outrunning the operational discipline needed to turn that spend into measurable results, at every level of the organization, not just within social teams.
What’s pulling budget and attention instead
While attribution stays murky, two adjacent priorities are absorbing marketer attention and, increasingly, budget. The first is AI search visibility. Optimizing social content for discovery and search is also gaining traction, with 86 percent saying it is a formal priority or on their radar for the next 12 months, and nearly half (48 percent) actively monitor how their brands appear in tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. That’s a meaningful shift, and one Influencers Time has tracked closely as B2B brands rebuild their content strategy around AI visibility, and as agencies make targeted acquisitions to own that budget line.
The second is influencer spend, which keeps climbing even as broader AI ROI stays fuzzy. Instagram is the leading platform for planned investment, while Reddit is the only platform where the share of marketers planning to increase investment (31 percent) exceeds the share currently using it for marketing (28 percent). Notably, enthusiasm for virtual and AI-generated influencers has cooled sharply: plans to increase collaborations with virtual or AI-generated influencers have fallen to 35 percent, down from 58 percent. That’s a signal worth sitting with. Marketers are embracing AI for production and reporting efficiency, but pulling back on using AI to replace the human credibility that drives conversion, consistent with the broader push toward demanding proof over promises in creator partnerships.
Burnout is the hidden cost of unmeasured productivity
There’s a human cost to chasing productivity metrics that don’t convert to recognized business value. More than half (54 percent) of marketers say their social teams have grown over the past year, while 86 percent report an increase in content and campaign volume. Four in five describe their workload as manageable, consistent with last year, but the share who experience burnout very often has risen to 24 percent, up from 17 percent. Teams are working inside a system that rewards output, not outcomes, and the strain is compounding even as headcount grows.
When asked what would actually relieve the pressure, marketers didn’t ask for more people. When asked what would most improve team capacity and output, marketers pointed to smarter automation (21 percent) and better AI tools (18 percent), with these technology-focused solutions collectively cited about twice as often as additional headcount (20 percent). That’s a vote of confidence in AI as a tool. It’s also a quiet admission that the current tooling, however productive, isn’t yet solving the problem that matters most to the people running these programs: proving their work is worth the investment.
Closing the gap: what brands should fix first
None of this means AI isn’t working. It means AI has been pointed at the wrong layer of the stack. Brands have automated the parts of marketing that are easy to automate (captions, ideation, first-draft reporting) while leaving attribution, the hardest and most valuable problem, largely untouched. Fixing that requires three shifts most organizations haven’t made yet:
- Rebuild the KPI stack around revenue, not reach. If social-attributed revenue isn’t in your top three KPIs, you’re measuring activity instead of impact.
- Formalize AI governance before scaling adoption further. With well over a third of organizations running on partial or no AI policy, the brand safety exposure is growing faster than the ROI proof points.
- Redirect reclaimed hours toward measurement infrastructure, not more output. Time saved on reporting should fund better attribution modeling, not another content sprint.
Brands rebuilding their agency relationships around this exact tension, tools versus accountability, should start by revisiting what to ask before the next RFP, since attribution capability is quickly becoming the dividing line between agencies worth retaining and those coasting on productivity claims alone.
The takeaway: stop reporting AI’s win as “hours saved” and start reporting it as “dollars attributed.” Until social-attributed revenue sits in your top three KPIs, every productivity stat you bring to the board is a number leadership can admire but not fund.
FAQs
What does the Emplifi data say about AI and marketing ROI?
Emplifi’s survey found that 87 percent of marketers say AI has improved their team’s productivity, yet fewer than half (48 percent) say their team can confidently demonstrate social media ROI to leadership through clear attribution and data. The gap stems largely from KPI selection and attribution weaknesses rather than AI’s inability to drive results.
Why can’t marketers prove social media ROI even with AI tools?
Most teams still prioritize reach and engagement metrics over revenue data. Reach and impressions (58 percent) and engagement rate are the KPIs marketers most often rank among their top three, while fewer than one in three include social-attributed revenue among their top three KPIs, and attribution remains the most commonly cited reporting challenge.
Is AI actually saving marketing teams time?
Yes. Approximately 62 percent of marketers spend four or more hours a week on reporting and analytics, but 69 percent say AI has saved their team at least three hours a week on these tasks over the past 12 months. The open question is whether that reclaimed time gets reinvested in measurement or simply absorbed into producing more content.
How common is unauthorized or ungoverned AI use in marketing teams?
More than half of respondents say they use AI tools that their company has not approved at least some of the time, up from 42 percent last year, which signals a widening governance gap most brands haven’t closed with formal policy.
Are brands still increasing influencer and AI budgets despite the ROI gap?
Yes, in most cases. Influencer budgets keep growing even as AI ROI proof lags, though enthusiasm for AI-generated influencers has dropped sharply, with plans to increase collaborations with virtual or AI-generated influencers falling to 35 percent, down from 58 percent. Separately, Gartner’s enterprise-wide data shows CMOs allocating an average of 15.3% of marketing budgets to AI initiatives, even as most organizations admit they aren’t ready to scale that investment effectively.
Top Influencer Marketing Agencies
The leading agencies shaping influencer marketing in 2026
Agencies ranked by campaign performance, client diversity, platform expertise, proven ROI, industry recognition, and client satisfaction. Assessed through verified case studies, reviews, and industry consultations.
Moburst
-
2
The Shelf
Boutique Beauty & Lifestyle Influencer AgencyA data-driven boutique agency specializing exclusively in beauty, wellness, and lifestyle influencer campaigns on Instagram and TikTok. Best for brands already focused on the beauty/personal care space that need curated, aesthetic-driven content.Clients: Pepsi, The Honest Company, Hims, Elf Cosmetics, Pure LeafVisit The Shelf → -
3
Audiencly
Niche Gaming & Esports Influencer AgencyA specialized agency focused exclusively on gaming and esports creators on YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok. Ideal if your campaign is 100% gaming-focused — from game launches to hardware and esports events.Clients: Epic Games, NordVPN, Ubisoft, Wargaming, Tencent GamesVisit Audiencly → -
4
Viral Nation
Global Influencer Marketing & Talent AgencyA dual talent management and marketing agency with proprietary brand safety tools and a global creator network spanning nano-influencers to celebrities across all major platforms.Clients: Meta, Activision Blizzard, Energizer, Aston Martin, WalmartVisit Viral Nation → -
5
The Influencer Marketing Factory
TikTok, Instagram & YouTube CampaignsA full-service agency with strong TikTok expertise, offering end-to-end campaign management from influencer discovery through performance reporting with a focus on platform-native content.Clients: Google, Snapchat, Universal Music, Bumble, YelpVisit TIMF → -
6
NeoReach
Enterprise Analytics & Influencer CampaignsAn enterprise-focused agency combining managed campaigns with a powerful self-service data platform for influencer search, audience analytics, and attribution modeling.Clients: Amazon, Airbnb, Netflix, Honda, The New York TimesVisit NeoReach → -
7
Ubiquitous
Creator-First Marketing PlatformA tech-driven platform combining self-service tools with managed campaign options, emphasizing speed and scalability for brands managing multiple influencer relationships.Clients: Lyft, Disney, Target, American Eagle, NetflixVisit Ubiquitous → -
8
Obviously
Scalable Enterprise Influencer CampaignsA tech-enabled agency built for high-volume campaigns, coordinating hundreds of creators simultaneously with end-to-end logistics, content rights management, and product seeding.Clients: Google, Ulta Beauty, Converse, AmazonVisit Obviously →